carbon dating debunked myths

I think that hate really started up when they proved the Shroud of Turin a fake - that was an 'egg on the face' moment for the god botherers.

12-8-2011  · A very common claim of young earth creationists in trying to reject the evidence for an old earth is to loudly proclaim that radiometric dating methods ...

The half-life of a radioactive isotope (usually denoted by t 1/2 ) is a more familiar concept than the mean-life, so although the equations above are expressed in terms of the mean-life, it is more usual to quote the value of 14
C 's half-life than its mean-life. [note 1] The currently accepted value for the half-life of 14
C is 5,730 years. [5] This means that after 5,730 years, only half of the initial 14
C will remain; a quarter will remain after 11,460 years; an eighth after 17,190 years; and so on.

Deposited layers can be later eroded away or destroyed in other ways, and drought can prevent layers from being deposited at all for long periods of time. However, the above statement is very misleading in that it insinuates that the geologic column is somehow a “figment of the evolutionist’s imagination.” The truth is that the geologic records all over the world are very well correlated with each other, not only with stratigraphy (., which layer overlies which layer) and fossils, but with paleomagnetism, radiometric dating, and many other important factors, all of which fit together remarkably well.

Still, the idea that this cloth somehow “debunks” the shroud is nonsense. It simply does not follow.  It says nothing at all about the Turin shroud itself—unless you inhabit a universe in which all shrouds must be made of identical materials and therefore, the shroud of Turin is necessarily a fake.  It doesn’t cast “serious doubt” as the Discovery Channel says (while failing to inform readers of the updated carbon dating), nor does it “disprove” as another article said.

carbon dating debunked mythscarbon dating debunked myths

myths about carbon dating

12-8-2011  · A very common claim of young earth creationists in trying to reject the evidence for an old earth is to loudly proclaim that radiometric dating methods ...

carbon dating flaws debunked myths

Deposited layers can be later eroded away or destroyed in other ways, and drought can prevent layers from being deposited at all for long periods of time. However, the above statement is very misleading in that it insinuates that the geologic column is somehow a “figment of the evolutionist’s imagination.” The truth is that the geologic records all over the world are very well correlated with each other, not only with stratigraphy (., which layer overlies which layer) and fossils, but with paleomagnetism, radiometric dating, and many other important factors, all of which fit together remarkably well.

carbon dating myths and facts

Still, the idea that this cloth somehow “debunks” the shroud is nonsense. It simply does not follow.  It says nothing at all about the Turin shroud itself—unless you inhabit a universe in which all shrouds must be made of identical materials and therefore, the shroud of Turin is necessarily a fake.  It doesn’t cast “serious doubt” as the Discovery Channel says (while failing to inform readers of the updated carbon dating), nor does it “disprove” as another article said.

News

Carbon dating doesn t work -- debunked

The half-life of a radioactive isotope (usually denoted by t 1/2 ) is a more familiar concept than the mean-life, so although the equations above are expressed in terms of the mean-life, it is more usual to quote the value of 14
C 's half-life than its mean-life. [note 1] The currently accepted value for the half-life of 14
C is 5,730 years. [5] This means that after 5,730 years, only half of the initial 14
C will remain; a quarter will remain after 11,460 years; an eighth after 17,190 years; and so on.

Arhive